Documents
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Dred Scott v. Sandford was an 1857 United States Supreme Court decision holding, in an opinion written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, that people of African descent, whether enslaved or free, could never be United States citizens and had no standing to sue in federal court, and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the federal territories, striking down the Missouri Compromise. The ruling is widely regarded by historians and legal scholars as the low point of the Supreme Court's history: it deepened the sectional crisis over slavery rather than resolving it, and its holdings on citizenship and territorial slavery were overturned by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments after the Civil War.
Facts
Key ProvisionDecided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857, Chief Justice Roger Taney's opinion held that Black Americans, whether enslaved or free, could never be citizens of the United States and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and further held that Congress lacked power to prohibit slavery in the federal territories, striking down the Missouri Compromise. Widely regarded as one of the Court's worst decisions, it deepened sectional conflict over slavery and was superseded by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments after the Civil War. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names United States directly: "Sandford was an 1857 United States Supreme Court decision holding, in an opinion written by Chief Justice Roger B."
Influenced
Lincoln publicly condemned the Supreme Court's 1857 Dred Scott decision during his 1858 debates with Stephen Douglas, and the case sharpened his emerging national political profile in the years before his election.
The Dred Scott ruling's denial of Black citizenship and constitutional protection deepened the sectional crisis that led to the Civil War and, within it, the Emancipation Proclamation.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.