Political Atlas

How Power Is Arranged
Political Concepts

Checks and Balances

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Checks and balances is the constitutional design principle that no single branch of government should accumulate enough power to govern unchecked, achieved by giving each branch specific tools to limit the others. Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, argued for separating legislative, executive and judicial power into three co-equal branches in his 1748 treatise The Spirit of the Laws, and the doctrine heavily shaped the framers of the United States Constitution of 1787, including James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. Under the American arrangement, Congress writes law, declares war and can override a presidential veto; the President vetoes bills, appoints officials and commands the armed forces; and the courts interpret the law, a power the Supreme Court used in Marbury v. Madison in 1803 to establish judicial review, striking down an unconstitutional act of Congress for the first time even though no clause of the Constitution names the power explicitly.

Facts
Origin YearSourced to the subject's own account
1748 1
Founding Context
Formulated as an explicit constitutional design principle by Montesquieu in his 1748 treatise The Spirit of the Laws, which argued for separating legislative, executive and judicial power into co-equal branches, and put into constitutional practice by the framers of the United States Constitution of 1787. 2
Learn More
Three Branches, No Referee

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Montesquieu did not trust virtue to keep power in check, so he built a system that did not need to. In The Spirit of the Laws, he argued that liberty survives only where legislative, executive and judicial power are held by three separate bodies, each strong enough to resist the other two but none strong enough to govern alone. There is no referee standing above the three branches in this design; the branches referee each other. The framers who wrote the United States Constitution in 1787, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton chief among them, built the American government directly on that premise. Congress writes the laws, declares war, and can override a presidential veto; the President can veto Congress's bills, appoints the officials who run the executive branch, and commands the armed forces; and the courts interpret what the other two have done, ready to say when either has gone beyond its own authority. No single branch answers only to itself, which was exactly Montesquieu's point: a government that checks itself does not need to be trusted to be safe.

The Power the Constitution Never Named

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Nowhere does the United States Constitution say the Supreme Court may strike down a law Congress has passed. The framers seem to have expected the power would exist, but they left it unwritten, and it took until 1803 for the Court to claim it out loud. In Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall's Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional for the first time, reasoning that a written constitution is meaningless if an ordinary law can override it, and that saying what the law is, including whether a law is even valid, is the essence of judicial power. The ruling gave the judiciary a check the other two branches could not simply out-vote: neither Congress repealing the act nor the President enforcing it could undo a determination that the act had never been valid at all. Judicial review is now treated as one of the three pillars of the American system of checks and balances, alongside the veto and the override, even though the clause that supposedly grants it does not exist.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Influenced By

Sources
1. Separation of Powers under the United States Constitution (Wikipedia)
Wikipedialead section
Quote, lead section
The American form of separation of powers is associated with a system of checks and balances.
View the Source
1. Separation of Powers under the United States Constitution (Wikipedia)
WikipediaAssociated With: Separation of PowersView the Source
1. Separation of Powers under the United States Constitution (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Article: Three Branches, No RefereeView the Source
1. Separation of Powers under the United States Constitution (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Article: The Power the Constitution Never NamedView the Source
2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Montesquieu
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy4.2 Liberty
Quote, 4.2 Liberty
it is necessary from the very nature of things that power should be a check to power
View the Source
Tyranny of the Majority (Wikipedia)
WikipediaAssociated With: Majority Rule and Minority RightsView the Source
Federalist Papers (Britannica)
Encyclopaedia BritannicaInfluenced By: Federalist PapersView the Source
A More Perfect Union (National Archives)
U.S. National ArchivesInfluenced By: United States ConstitutionView the Source
Magna Carta (Britannica)
Encyclopaedia BritannicaInfluenced By: Magna CartaView the Source
Marbury v. Madison (National Archives)
United States National Archives and Records AdministrationInfluenced By: Marbury v. MadisonView the Source
Bill of Rights, British History (Britannica)
Encyclopaedia BritannicaInfluenced By: English Bill of Rights 1689View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.